23:05:33yitziShould the "x3j13-issues: ..." be done in the same way? With a changes file, etc. I skipped one commit b.c. I wasn't sure.
23:16:54scymtymi think so. my plan is to have every direct change (that is without going through an WSCL issue) to source material as a separate commit and with a "paper trail" to make all such changes addressable and transparent
23:17:28scymtymi think gilberth even uses patches in order to leave the sources untouched but that seemed to hardcore to me
23:21:45yitziI can see that perspective, but I agree that seems like a lot of work since the goal is too fix issues, etc with WSCL.
4:53:50jcowansplittist: I never have a problem with "clhs <term>", only with "clhs" by itself. If I'm not quite sure what actual term I want, I use "index" or "chapter" or "glossary" as <term>.
7:44:07splittistjcowan: I don't, either. I just wanted to try the prettier ones to experience the difference.