libera/#sicl - IRC Chatlog
Search
19:48:30
yitzi
scymtym: I've updated the y-fixes branch with my work so far. I skipped over the commits we discussed and also 04eab95f01eee3dd3eefbda1a0c3587180b4f5ad (just for now). Feel free to force push back over to fixes or work off of that branch if you want. I'll start up again tomorrow.
23:01:31
scymtym
yitzi: i force-pushed my changes to y-fixes. i split some TODO comments off one commit (those are meant to be addressed, not become part of the specification source) and addressed one TODO comment (class-name → metaclass-name). i split some changes into smaller changes. and i added more changes, some with the new :LISTING change kind which indicates Common Lisp-level fixes in listings
23:05:33
yitzi
Should the "x3j13-issues: ..." be done in the same way? With a changes file, etc. I skipped one commit b.c. I wasn't sure.
23:16:54
scymtym
i think so. my plan is to have every direct change (that is without going through an WSCL issue) to source material as a separate commit and with a "paper trail" to make all such changes addressable and transparent
23:17:28
scymtym
i think gilberth even uses patches in order to leave the sources untouched but that seemed to hardcore to me
23:21:45
yitzi
I can see that perspective, but I agree that seems like a lot of work since the goal is too fix issues, etc with WSCL.
4:53:50
jcowan
splittist: I never have a problem with "clhs <term>", only with "clhs" by itself. If I'm not quite sure what actual term I want, I use "index" or "chapter" or "glossary" as <term>.