18:57:09bikei don't think there are any that are truly only interpreted
18:57:28bikeinterpreters are pretty dumb. if you're going to go through all the effort to get a lisp implementation you probably don't want to leave it dumb
19:03:30nij-I see. That's why! BOCL could provide the first one that has "actual use". Cool.
3:33:54nij-By the way, in BOCL v1's readme, you wrote "All objects have the same basic representation as a header containing a pointer to the class of the object and a pointer to a vector (not a Common Lisp vector) with the objects-specific contents."
3:34:44nij-Do you still want to use vectors for object-specific contents? I see you use struct in v2 (e.g. cons).
4:18:53beachnij-: I don't think the Lisp code can be evaluated. It is just an experiment.
4:19:33beachThe header is a struct. The rack is a vector.