libera/#sicl - IRC Chatlog
Search
23:01:31
scymtym
yitzi: i force-pushed my changes to y-fixes. i split some TODO comments off one commit (those are meant to be addressed, not become part of the specification source) and addressed one TODO comment (class-name → metaclass-name). i split some changes into smaller changes. and i added more changes, some with the new :LISTING change kind which indicates Common Lisp-level fixes in listings
23:05:33
yitzi
Should the "x3j13-issues: ..." be done in the same way? With a changes file, etc. I skipped one commit b.c. I wasn't sure.
23:16:54
scymtym
i think so. my plan is to have every direct change (that is without going through an WSCL issue) to source material as a separate commit and with a "paper trail" to make all such changes addressable and transparent
23:17:28
scymtym
i think gilberth even uses patches in order to leave the sources untouched but that seemed to hardcore to me
23:21:45
yitzi
I can see that perspective, but I agree that seems like a lot of work since the goal is too fix issues, etc with WSCL.
4:53:50
jcowan
splittist: I never have a problem with "clhs <term>", only with "clhs" by itself. If I'm not quite sure what actual term I want, I use "index" or "chapter" or "glossary" as <term>.
7:44:07
splittist
jcowan: I don't, either. I just wanted to try the prettier ones to experience the difference.