libera/#shirakumo - IRC Chatlog
Search
18:04:25
Colleen
<gingerale> https://chat.tymoon.eu/data//shirakumo/a88ea96ee478b0b72d769640e7ea2185dffd008f9f21e3785d0b493a29c33ffb.png
18:04:45
Colleen
<gingerale> I'll make a floating window for the layers onto the canvas as well, for quick access.
18:06:04
Colleen
<gingerale> Not quite sure how the tile selection should look. But I think I'll make some sort of a quick access window for it as well, and a larger selection of the entire tileset that you can open and hide at the bottom.
18:07:28
Colleen
<shinmera> any reason you didn't just adjust the save mechanism of the other editor to get it done quick?
18:08:19
Colleen
<gingerale> It's easier for me to learn how everything works if I do it myself. It's not like I have a deadline.
20:39:10
Colleen
<shinmera> Also finally added a feature to FOR that I'd been missing forever: (for ((max maximizing y :key #'id))) for instance.
20:41:33
Colleen
<shinmera> and I honestly would not be surprised if I've written a manual updating variant of max/min a hundred times by now
20:44:52
mfiano
Shinmera: I uhh, know you must have experience with this, but how do you even respond to this:
20:45:00
mfiano
Subject: "Accept my pull request sooner", Body: "I recently wrote a macro for CL that allows you to temporarily set a renderer color. This is generally my first contribution to open source libraries. Please accept my pull request as soon as possible. This is very important to me."
20:45:39
mfiano
When said macro is not even within scope and said open source operates in a different manner.
20:47:17
mfiano
Seemed kind of rude and ignorant anyway and I wasn't planning on it. Just wondering what you do with all the weird requests you get (this is definitely not the first of similar emails from different people)
20:48:12
Colleen
<shinmera> I *did* just get an email titled "activities" with the text: What have you been doing now that Kandria is released? (as far as Lisp goes)
20:48:38
Colleen
<shinmera> Which I found to be rather weirdly probing, so I just replied with two lines of what is also public knowledge
20:52:50
Colleen
<shinmera> 99% of it is composed of people trying to scam keys, automated emails, and other product offer garbage
21:03:29
SAL9000
regarding the PR email -- probably misaligned incentives on the part of the sender, such as trying to pad out their resume with "open source contributor" line items
23:05:13
mfiano
The funny part is if this is so important to them, they didn't even tell me what repository they sent a PR to. It certainly wasn't any time "recent" that I see. Perhaps we have a different definition of 'recent' and 'important'. Ah well, not important to me, so not going to go hunting. I probably ignored it or asked for a second set of eyes for a reason.