19:07:26q3cpmaI actually read the entire loop spec a week ago, but it won't fully integrate 'til I've used it a lot, I guess
19:08:11_deathloop is not expressive enough for this collection, so you'd need to push it to some list yourself, or use another operator (iterate does support it, but maybe you want to stick to CL operators)
21:45:22karloszfor loading static fun address, one way to get around the 64-bit address thing is just to do rip relative loads from the current assembly routine
21:47:28karloszno need for a temp register that way
21:52:02karloszi don't remember how to do rip-relative loads from the current assembly routine though
21:53:41stassatswhat's the current assembly routine?
21:59:20karloszstassats: for example, in static-fun-addr, since that's only used from assembly routines, and assembly routines live within 32-bit displacements from the static-fun-addrs, i figured we can compute the static-fun-addrs just from the current instruction being emitted or something