Search
14:02:04
luis
Compiling --with-sb-devel causes extra test failures (on windows at least). That's unfortunate.
14:50:26
Krystof
how legitimate are the test failures? (i.e. are they failing because e.g. there is an out-of-line call?)
14:50:40
Krystof
adding :fails-on :sb-devel for all of those would be fine
17:16:04
luis
Krystof: I'll try and look into it. (My manager is not 100% thrilled by my new junior compiler engineer role. :))
17:16:56
luis
Shinmera: https://sourceforge.net/p/sbcl/mailman/message/37302946/ should solve your anti-virus woes but see the micro-benchmark within
17:35:00
luis
Shinmera: hopefully you can afford and extra 20 cycles per FFI call
17:35:10
Shinmera
I don't know if I can.
17:35:38
Shinmera
but I can't say without benchmarking.
17:36:00
Shinmera
Kandria is already pretty slow, though mostly due to method dispatch.
17:39:06
stassats
luis: sb-devel should have no additional failures (and hasn't been observed to have)
17:40:42
luis
stassats: I have observed it on Windows!
19:11:58
Krystof
luis: if it's any consolation, neither is mine
19:18:17
Krystof
though you've clearly put in more time and effort on SBCL recently than I have!