12:07:35port19Oh right, one thing I forgot to ask earlier in the racket vs common lisp for me as a clojure dev seeking native binaries: startup time is about equal? My main bottlenecks are network requests and always will be, but when that isn't the case (e.g. you invoke my program with the help flag) I want a near instant response (< 1 display frame / 16ms)
12:08:19port19Basically do I assume correctly that both racket and common lisp binaries start fast enough?
12:09:09mariariRacket has a top level considered harmful issue
14:47:19rozenglassmoon-child: maybe a chain nth would be more readable and generic, something like (deep-nth 1 2 3 some-list), or some threading-like thingy like (->> some-list (nth 1) (nth 2) (nth 3)) I guess
14:47:50rozenglassnot sure if those would have had significant performance impact on the machines of old
18:14:56skinClojure has something like that. `get-in` https://clojuredocs.org/clojure.core/get-in . Trying to think of how to do it in Common Lisp better tho