Search
Sunday, 9th of April 2023, 1:08:05 UTC
4:32:56
beach
Can someone explain this warning from SBCL: https://plaster.tymoon.eu/view/3739#3739 ?
4:33:15
beach
When I remove the INLINE declaration, the warning disappears.
4:35:29
beach
I guess I made some mistake, but I don't see it. Also, the message contains the name of a variable that is not very explicit.
4:41:42
beach
Oh, wait. Never mind. You can't reproduce it anyway. Sorry!
4:56:25
beach
Try this one: https://plaster.tymoon.eu/view/3740#3740
5:35:42
mfiano
Can you see what the warning changes to if you return NIL or (VALUES) instead of NEW-VALUE?
5:36:08
mfiano
or CONS for that matter
5:36:54
mfiano
I don't think it is upset about the return value, but I would like to make sure first.
5:37:36
mfiano
Oh it included source information. Nevermind.
5:38:53
mfiano
I am not seeing anything, for whatever that's worth.
5:48:45
beach
You mean, you are not seeing anything wrong with the code?
5:49:21
beach
If so, thanks for looking!
6:25:09
beach
Now, CLtL2 is freely available, but what are we allowed to do with the material? I am asking because it could be an excellent starting point for a language reference.
6:25:20
saturn2
beach: i think you wrote (list) when you meant list in the last line of cadr*
6:25:57
beach
Oh, right you are! Thank you!
12:11:42
specbot
http://www.lispworks.com/reference/HyperSpec/Body/f_substc.htm
12:12:01
beach
That page suggests that NSUBST only replaces leaves of the tree.
12:13:02
beach
A case for WSCL it seems.
Sunday, 9th of April 2023, 13:08:05 UTC