21:12:46pjbyes, partial reading of clhs is dangerous.
21:17:05Bikedon't try to play this off with "yes". i am disagreeing with you. someone said something and you tried to correct them with something false.
4:50:03jmesThanks for the info all of you, and the appropriate CLHS links :)
4:52:34jmesSorry I dropped my question and ran off for a bit. The answer illuminates some neat behaviour, thanks! Now I should go delete some redundancy in my code...