libera/#commonlisp - IRC Chatlog
Search
1:20:03
resttime
Could someone explain this behaviour I'm seeing when trying to define a new VOP in SBCL? https://plaster.tymoon.eu/view/3345#3345
1:21:51
resttime
Whether it's a lambda and a function doesn't seem to use the VOP I'm expecting but a funcall of a lambda does
1:23:35
resttime
I'm just trying to add two fixnums together, and don't understand the addition isn't happening in all three cases
1:43:25
reb`
asarch: No, it's to provide developers with a way to modify the behavior of the language.
1:54:17
Bike
resttime: i am not an expert on sbcl internals, but i'm reasonably confident that you can't just refer to lisp lexical variables in a vop generator?
1:59:40
Bike
well, add-vop seems to be returning the first argument in the first two cases. maybe you have to do something else to ensure that the result of add actually gets into the result register.
7:21:40
jackdaniel
i.e https://github.com/fredokun/cl-jupyter (I'm not sure whether this is what they use)
7:22:24
jackdaniel
https://github.com/yitzchak/common-lisp-jupyter/ this seems to be a more likely thing that they use given the list of contributors
13:15:32
drmeister
We use jupyterlab all the time. Use https://github.com/yitzchak/common-lisp-jupyter/ it is way more advanced and updated. I've been supporting development of it for more than a year.