7:15:44lisp123wI wonder if they would consider open sourcing it like they did with the code
7:42:54jackdaniellisp123w: mind that there are some disrapencies with clim 2.0 (and while some are adopted in mcclim, the specification we follow is clim 2.0 with our own corrections)
8:17:47lisp123wjackdaniel: Thanks, yeah I noted that too. Just trying to read from different angles for now to understand things better, but not using it as a 'reference'
8:40:58jackdanielyes, reading franz clim guide is fine
8:41:32jackdanielmind that lispworks clim guide is also a good read with better separation between "programmer" abstractions and "if you really want to tinker with clim" chapters
8:42:18jackdanielloke: I'm working on incremental redisplay and your issue reports (from 2018!) provide valuable test cases, thanks
8:44:01loke[m]jackdaniel thanks for for the mention. 😁