7:15:44lisp123wI wonder if they would consider open sourcing it like they did with the code
7:42:54jackdaniellisp123w: mind that there are some disrapencies with clim 2.0 (and while some are adopted in mcclim, the specification we follow is clim 2.0 with our own corrections)
8:17:47lisp123wjackdaniel: Thanks, yeah I noted that too. Just trying to read from different angles for now to understand things better, but not using it as a 'reference'