21:31:28raltis there an easy way to access an element by name, e.g.: `((:server . "nginx") (:etag . "foo"))` looping through every element looks ugly. Want to get a drakma response header.
3:59:16ck_tourjin: you can get slime through the emacs package system, for example. Search for "Melpa packages" to set that up
4:00:39jeosolIs there a work around to save SBCL from slime (normally do that from the shell). Keep getting this message: "Cannot save core with multiple threads running."
5:15:15fragamusanyhow anyone point me to the main()
5:16:19LdBethBut seem you have not idea that you need also standard C lib to run CLISP
5:17:31fragamusthat is already part of the system into which i am embedding
5:22:22pjbfragamus: lisp.run is in a place that depends on the installation of clisp. For example, it can be something like: /usr/local/lib/clisp-2.49.93+/base/lisp.run
5:22:46pjbfragamus: The best is to get the sources of clisp and to configure and compile them yourself.
5:23:38fragamuswhat source file contains the main()
5:23:48pjbfragamus: clisp implementation is made much more complex than what you want, because it has to deal with two stacks: a normal C stack, and a lisp VM stack.
5:44:14beachI wonder how many toy interpreters for toy versions of Lisp there are out there. And I wonder how many of them are actually used.
5:44:35pjbtourjn: My personnal preference is to use the slime provided by quicklisp, since slime needs a swank, and it's better if it comes from the same version.
5:44:45beachMy impression is that there is at least one such project per year announced here.
5:44:57pjbbeach: approximatively as many as lisp students + compiler student.
5:45:31no-defun-allowedbeach: On r/lisp, about once every two months.
5:45:33pjbfragamus: + have a look at https://www.informatimago.com/articles/usenet.html#Compilation
5:48:14mfianoToy Lisp interpreters comes up more often on the Lisp Discord server. Though it is quite a bit more active of a forum than here
5:48:48no-defun-allowedBut then, I'd say only 40% actually implement list processing.
5:49:35no-defun-allowed(My theory is they can't be bugged to write a parser for their favourite language, since that 60% rarely follows any Lisp semantics.)
6:10:49verisimilitudePaul Graham's toy Lisp still gets some attention.
6:13:08jeosol|3b|: didnt get it to work. Just reran the procedure on terminal and saved the image that way
6:15:08jackdanielhow would you define a type denoting a homogenous sequence? something like '(sequence* integer)
6:18:15jackdanielusing satisfies with lambda won't work, because satisfies expects a symbol