Search
3:16:35
fauxm
so I have a function that spits out one output when I call it in SLIME, and another when I use stumpwm-s eval
3:17:26
fauxm
it's not modified or anything
3:17:57
fauxm
it just spits out a different result when I call it from SLIME vs via the eval feature
3:29:43
fauxm
it appears to be a namespace issue
3:59:05
fauxm
or maybe a scoping issue
5:24:52
PuercoPop
fauxm: are you running slime in the same process as StumpWM?