1:22:02philwebDoes a mechanism exist to have slime maintain multiple independent histories? (i.e. I'd like to maintain separate repl histories per instance: 1) local ccl 2) local sbcl 3) remote sbcl etc)
7:20:26luisphilweb: not at the moment. That might be nice, yes. Although a unified history is probably a better default.
9:07:57philweb@luis: thanks, just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something. Agreed that the current behavior is a good default. When dealing with multiple simultaneous instances on different machines it can get tedious.