3:07:12beachCorrections are to be expected. The less experienced as a technical writer you are, the more corrections will likely be required.
3:07:38beach... depending on the referee of course.
3:09:56beachReferee number 1 clearly understood the idea and suggested another paper to read and cite. That's the kind of referee report I like.
3:10:11no-defun-allowedYes, I'm more than happy with the result.
3:13:22beachIt can happen that some referees on some conferences are not that great. Some of them are not qualified to read and understand the papers they referee, and their reports can be infuriating. But the list of members of the program committee for ELS2021 seemed pretty good. No doubt because Marco knows how to choose them.
3:17:13beachEven the "reject" is not bad. The main reason for the reject is that the technique has not been tested. That's fair, I guess.
3:17:50beachAnyway, I can see that, like no-defun-allowed, I also have some work ahead of me.
3:20:25beachno-defun-allowed: Is this your first article in a peer-reviewed forum?
3:22:52beachELS is not a very prestigious forum, and it may not be as tough about the quality of the articles as some of the more prestigious ones, but it's a serious academic conference, so your accepted article counts.
3:38:45alandipertcongrats no-defun-allowed and beach!