freenode/#sicl - IRC Chatlog
Search
16:13:04
splittist
beach: not a terribly helpful comment, but when you nest 7 layers deep, I don't think you need both an increase the length/depth of the numbering AND a further layer of indentation. That is, if you are already expressing the full reference ("2.2.1.2.1.2.1.2.3.2.1.2.3."), you don't also need to indent that reference. If you are indenting the reference, you don't need the full reference, you can just use the innermost
16:13:05
splittist
reference - but in this case you need to differentiate the levels (arabic, lower alpha, lower roman, ...). Or you can mix it up: keep the full reference to the first couple of levels, then break into different numbering schemes.
17:33:10
beach
I am off in order to fix dinner for my (admittedly small) family. I'll be back tomorrow.
18:51:32
scymtym
(restart-case 1 (continue () :report 1)) is valid and means that the restart body has two forms, :report and 1, right? based on the grammar, keyword options whose "value" is not of the specified type would just be interpreted as forms in the handler body. however, for :TEST and :INTERACTIVE "The value … must be a suitable argument to function.". for :REPORT, on the other hand, the description is "If the value supplied
18:53:48
scymtym
(i think it would better if :test 1, :report 1, :interactive 1 were all illegal but that doesn't seem like a defensible interpretation)
20:28:07
scymtym
as long as :TEST is considered a body form in (restart-case … (continue () :test))), i don't see a clear winner between the remaining alternatives
20:28:16
Bike
yours. I mean, in clasp this will expand to bla bla bla (restart-bind ((continue #'(lambda ...) :report-function #'1)) ...)
20:29:17
scymtym
ah, ok. that's slightly worse, i agree. i think it should be either an error or two body forms
4:04:28
no-defun-allowed
The enrolment server is back up, but I still don't have an account, and it will take another "few days" to get that sorted out. At least they will extend the enrolment deadline.