freenode/#sicl - IRC Chatlog
Search
3:52:57
beach
Bike: By "subject to capture" I meant (block name (f (lambda () (return-from name)))) where F is unknown.
3:54:20
beach
Bike: I used the wrong terminology. I mean the CATCH would have a reference to the first instruction of the BLOCK/TAGBODY, to the SUCCESSOR of the BLOCK/TAGBODY (not the exit), and to each instruction following a tag.
3:55:26
beach
Bike: If we remove those references, we are back to the problem we previously had with computing ownership. But if you are OK with that, sure, then we can skip those references.
3:57:16
beach
Bike: I will be busy most of the day, because loke is coming over for lunch. I will cook, then pick him up at the train station, etc...
9:22:04
|3b|
when generating code from eq-instruction, should i be looking at the predecessors of the instructions in the 2 branches to determine where they merge againi?
9:41:14
|3b|
and are there other situations (tagbody?) where an instruction would have multiple predecessors without a corresponding if-like instruction so i could just look at a stack of branches to see which is merging?