10:52:32no-defun-allowedAfter fixing everything, my table is somehow 400 picoseconds faster (on average of a lot of samples and sizes) at reading the cache than the table in SBCL.
10:54:26no-defun-allowedThat's a really strange difference - it'd be about 1.5 cycles faster?
11:00:25beachBecause it is not an integral number of cycles you mean?
11:01:38no-defun-allowedYes, also that the difference is pretty close to one cycle. Is that even significant? It could be the other way around on another machine.
11:55:49no-defun-allowedOn the other hand, there is a lot of improvement to be made with inserting mappings. Maybe I should just include the SICL hash functions in my "standalone" implementation, since the table is picky about hash functions.
21:22:56alandipertpushed a JACL project update that suggests possible future overlap with SICL via ECL https://gist.github.com/alandipert/a79a345f1b4c822c4d8ddaf992a5fc30