Search
11:18:16
flip214
Using (TIME ...) gives me 1.1sec (real or user). Using sb-sprof:with-profiling tells me "sampling time: 0.0279 sec" for the same form.
11:18:44
flip214
Another (TIME) around the w-p says 1.5 sec, so nothing is skipped.
11:19:12
flip214
why doesn't sprof trace for longer? I've got :sample-interval 0.0001 and :max-samples 1000000
14:23:24
_death
this paper has a useful glossary https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221252239_Python_compiler_for_CMU_common_Lisp
14:48:13
_death
hmm, seems there's a more up-to-date paper, https://common-lisp.net/project/cmucl/downloads/doc/CMUCL-design.pdf (via https://github.com/guicho271828/sbcl-wiki/wiki )
15:35:11
stassats
lukego: a machine thingy
15:35:39
lukego
please don't say "more up to date" when talking about a 100 page document that I have recently printed hardcopy ;-)
15:36:16
lukego
oh phew I think it's the same one :)
15:36:16
stassats
mapping eventually either to a register or to a stack location
15:36:46
lukego
thanks. yeah I mostly just wondered about the acronym so I don't guess constantly while reading
15:36:54
lukego
I'm trying to finally start the process of understanding how sbcl works
15:36:55
stassats
(or both, spilling and all that)
15:38:29
stassats
although, it doesn't really have a name, and not sure what's so temporary about it
15:39:51
stassats
if VOP is a virtual operator, then TN is a virtual operand