Search
Sunday, 11th of August 2019, 5:20:42 UTC
15:55:47
mrcode_
is this a bug ? https://pastebin.com/cdJkr0NZ
15:56:29
mrcode_
or am i misunderstanding something ?
15:56:38
mrcode_
(I hope it is the latter)
16:25:22
pkhuong
yeah, it's a bug in the extrating VOP.
16:26:39
pkhuong
you can apply https://gist.github.com/pkhuong/3df1640c1a0b852fecd3309291d738bf and rebuild
16:26:50
pkhuong
i'll go look for more instances
16:27:40
mrcode_
was just looking at the same code
16:48:59
mrcode_
pkhuong: i also have another diff at https://github.com/sbcl/sbcl/pull/35
16:51:30
mrcode_
on another note: is there an interest in accepting an epoll/kqueue/iocp package for sbcl into contrib?
16:57:57
pkhuong
mrcode_: ^L are intentional
16:58:02
pkhuong
they're navigation markers
16:58:53
pkhuong
we also don't use github pull requests.
16:59:35
pkhuong
what would be the point of having such a contrib?
16:59:45
pkhuong
that could be distributed via quicklisp
17:12:58
mrcode_
pkhuong: ok,good to know about ^L
17:14:42
mrcode_
and github requests. as for the package like this, was thinking of removing unnecessary layers of abstraction and going through the sbcl specific facilities for less complex code.
17:16:08
pkhuong
mrcode_: specifically what part means it has to be a contrib instead of an sbcl-specific package?
Sunday, 11th of August 2019, 17:20:42 UTC