Search
11:32:18
stassats
i wonder if i can still break inlining
11:42:01
stassats
the binaries for sparc or mips can't be used to build current HEAD
11:42:19
stassats
i can build in steps, and i could make new binaries, but will they work on old glibcs?
11:44:16
stassats
2.28 on sparc and 2.19 on mips
12:49:31
stassats
The function SB-EXT:PURIFY is undefined.
16:12:54
stassats
i guess inline-expansion-limit should be per inline function, not for the whole component
16:13:20
stassats
or it shouldn't exist at all and properly deal with recursive inlining
16:18:40
stassats
the problem of SOME/EVERY and inline expansion is that it introduces an inline function after the IR has been optimized
16:18:53
stassats
now, can i induce that behavior without define a transform
16:21:22
stassats
i can even delay it for a long time until constraint propagation
16:25:25
stassats
and i can break my fix
16:25:40
stassats
"couldn't inline expand because expansion calls this LET-converted local function:"
16:25:50
stassats
not an error, but not something i want
16:39:01
stassats
it's going to happen rarely, unlike the SOME/EVERY stuff
16:39:28
stassats
but inline copying is the answer, and i want to use for some automatic inlining as well