freenode/#sbcl - IRC Chatlog
Search
15:30:30
flip214
White_Flame: my last suggestion was to do the DEFUN against a GENSYM, and conditionally do the SETF you described... but I didn't ask for feedback about that yet
16:18:19
corci
Project sbcl-master-fetch build #606: FAILURE in 8.2 sec: http://ci.cor-lab.de/job/sbcl-master-fetch/606/
16:28:18
corci
Project sbcl-master-fetch build #607: FIXED in 10 sec: http://ci.cor-lab.de/job/sbcl-master-fetch/607/
17:21:24
corci
Project sbcl-master-windows build #2583: FIXED in 4 hr 17 min: http://ci.cor-lab.de/job/sbcl-master-windows/2583/
18:51:40
White_Flame
flip214: yeah, there were a few ways mentioned. I ended up doing this: https://pastebin.com/1B9EgmVd
18:52:29
White_Flame
and that code should never run in SBCL anyway, because SBCL has an implementation for all the functions :-P
18:53:02
White_Flame
this is the macro which defines the fallback default functions, many of which simply report an error that functionality is not available on the current implementation
21:19:09
White_Flame
yeah, that was my thought. If you see non-toplevel, just blacklist it from type inference
21:19:54
White_Flame
all of this sort of stuff really begs for non-AOT recompilation, though I don't think any common lisp has tackled that yet
21:41:34
corci
Project sbcl-master-windows build #2585: FAILURE in 36 min: http://ci.cor-lab.de/job/sbcl-master-windows/2585/