16:57:21stassats`somebody decided some time ago to always issue notes on sap allocation
16:58:23stassats`i bet disabling that will break somebody's workflow
17:01:20nyef"With enough people, changing *anything* will break somebody's workflow."
17:03:14stassats`and now i'm wasting time on sbcl-devel@ arguing with people who don't like the amount of unfixed bugs on launchpad
17:04:27stassats`the blunder was engaging in any sort of communication to begin with, snarky or not
17:04:51scymtymthe problem seems to be a misunderstanding about what sbcl is ("team", "goals", "commercial support", etc.)
17:05:43scymtymstassats`: sorry to bother you with again but (COMPILE :NODE/LVAR :DERIVE-TYPE :MISC.2) still fails on x86: https://ci.cor-lab.org/job/sbcl-master/featureset=1,label=ubuntu_trusty_32bit/lastCompletedBuild/consoleFull
17:06:09stassats`scymtym: i guess it got missed, about that, should :allow-warnings t include style warnings?
17:06:42stassats`cause originally i had allow-style-warnings t, for both tests, but on x86-64 one of the tests failed with a warning
17:07:31dougkaccusing an open-source project of not having commercial support - wtf??
17:07:42scymtymit current doesn't so you can specific. you can specify both, though. but the fact that x86 and x86_64 signal different warnings is suspicious, isn't it?