11:05:23pfdietzThere could be several ways to handle a missing package. Substitute some other symbol, use a different package, use the current package. The use case was when I was trawling lisp code for forms for testing the compiler, and didn't want to have to define the packages before reading the forms.
11:10:15pfdietz(looks at launchpad) I thought I had created a ticket for this, but I don't see it.
11:10:42stassatsdon't create one, i'm going to adding some restarts now
11:15:46stassatsi'm not really liking hanging restart names off sb-ext, what about a new package, sb-restarts?
11:16:27stassatscan't move all existing restarts there...
11:17:36stassatsi might just move the recently added ones, not enough time has passed to really care about preserving their backwards compatibility
11:18:17stassatsdoes anyone like/not like having sb-restarts?
11:18:45stassatsor sb-ext is already simple enough?
11:20:30stassatswell, i no longer am so convinced either
11:20:44stassats"sb-restarts" is a bit too long too
11:22:06pfdietzFor SBCL specifics like that, it would be useful to separate things that a user can assume won't change, and that users should assume could change at any time.
11:23:32stassatsbut i can make a case for changing something added to it in the last couple of months, especially not frequently used non-interactively, like restarts
11:39:52stassatsfind-symbol and intern should get the same restarts as well