10:21:23jmercourisis there something like WITH-PACKAGE where you can use a specific package to wrap a body?
10:22:08jmercourisI'm imagining a way that you could have like (with-pacakge :some-package (xyz "a")) instead of having to do (some-package:xyz "a")
10:23:10jmercouriscould you make a macro using IN-PACKAGE? how could you detect the current package? or would you need to supply that to this theoretical macro?
10:24:17jmercourisinteresting so *package* seems to be a special variable
10:24:38jmercourisfascinating so you could keep a reference to that and easily make a with-package macro
10:26:38jmercourishas anyone else done this before? is this a known technique?
10:29:07LdBethjmercouris: the funny thing is if you use a macro other than in-package the compiler would not see that