21:57:42verisimilitudeIt helps if FUNCTION-LAMBDA-EXPRESSION gives a useful result instead of the useless one that's common. If you have the LAMBDA and its name, you can serialize the function definition.
22:11:19moldybitspjb: btw, doesn't lambda-list refer to (lambda <this-part> ...)?
22:13:26pjbmoldybits: Yes, this is why I wrote lambda expression which refers to the whole lambda expression.
22:14:17pjbverisimilitude: Since you cannot count on function-lambda-expression, you have to implement your own bookkeeping. see; Image Based Development http://www.informatimago.com/develop/lisp/com/informatimago/small-cl-pgms/ibcl/index.html
22:15:00pjbAn alternative, is when you have your own model for functions and other expressions, then you can implement a decompile method. This is what is done in Patchwork.
22:17:07moldybitsi meant the (print1 lambda-list stream) part?
22:17:44pjbYes, sorry, I meant (prin1 lambda-expression stream).
23:26:21XachHow can I get libsmokeqtwebkit.so on Debian 9 (for a quicklisp library)?