15:47:18Bike(though your sed syntax is wrong, Oh No!!)
15:53:25devonjackdaniel: Your graph at https://common-lisp.net/project/ecl/static/quarterly/img/vol4/all-hierarchy.png implausibly shows Lisp-to-C --> Star Sapphire
16:09:43devonJackDaniel: lol, according to a list of Commercial Common Lisp implementations at https://www.cs.cmu.edu/Groups/AI/html/faqs/lang/lisp/part4/faq-doc-2.html ... Star Sapphire Common LISP 3.4 ... Sapiens Software also has a Lisp-to-C translator in beta-test
16:16:54jackdanielso that means that I didn't made a mistake there?
16:19:55devonI'd guess the ...> arrow points the wrong way as SSCL is a complete product and I don't know whether the later Lisp-to-C product ever made it out of Beta.
16:21:27jackdanielI don't think Lisp-to-C translator has some code from Star Sapphire, if it is the component of the latter
16:22:02jackdanielso I'd say the direction is right here
16:23:07devonArrows normally indicate time and SSCL precedes Lisp-to-C
16:24:48devonSSCL is an interpreter written in C. Most likely Lisp-to-C is written in SSCL
16:26:00jackdanielarrows are not about timeline, note clasp <--> ecl (even if clasp is ecl's fork)
16:26:07jackdanielmany changes has been backported
16:27:23devonOk, if not ancestry, what do the arrows indicate?
16:28:18jackdanielsharing of the code, it's said in the legend
16:28:31jackdanielso if A is component of B, then B by definition shares code with A
16:28:59jackdanielif there are two implementations with common roots which dross-pollute, they share code with each other
16:30:38sjldoes "B shares code with A" means "some A's code is used by B" or "some of B's code is used by A"?
16:30:41devonUm, are you saying C ...> A means C = A + B in your graph?
16:30:57sjl"shares" is a bit ambiguous directionallu
16:31:44sjlI think, judging by the directionality of the other kinds of arrows, that A --> B means "B contains some of A's code"
16:33:14devonWe can be quite certain SSCL contains little or no LtC code.
16:33:52sjlthe legend says it means "B shares code with A", which might be interpreted the other way though. If "sjl shares coffee with jackdaniel" it's reasonable to expect that I've given you some of my coffee.
16:34:36jackdanielit's more code from A -----> appears in B
16:34:56devonWe can be certain code from SSCL appears in LtC.
16:35:01jackdanielif SSCL is a product which says, that it features LtC, then LtC is its component