13:04:32pveHi, are implementations required to store the source code of function definitions (as a string or cons)? I can see that on SBCL, (describe #'foo) shows me the source form, but (describe #'+) does not. Does it depend on the optimization settings used when compiling the code?
13:05:01beachIf they were, no commercial Common Lisp vendor would be in business.
13:05:15beachBecause you could then see the source code of the entire implementation.
13:06:21Bikebut yeah, probably depends on the SPACE and DEBUG optimization settings
14:07:09TwoNotesIn my logged error messages from a handler, I see a routine reference like this: "(semantics fun8)" I do have a function named "semantics" but what is the "fun8"??