0:59:46Bike::notify phoe why does pitman's handler-case impl (and by extension yours) get out of the handler functions with a tagbody, instead of just immediately doing the return-from?
0:59:46ColleenBike: Got it. I'll let phoe know as soon as possible.
5:39:43White_Flamethe loop stepping & termination conditions simply work on the value that's there, no matter how it got there
5:42:14White_Flamefor loop for blah IN my-list, though, I don't think the cons stepping variable is exposed, but for for-ON whatever's in BLAH will have its cdr as the next iteration
7:15:42phoe::notify Bike What do you mean? You cannot do RETURN-FROM in this case; you need to jump from the respective handler function to the respective handler case, and from the handler case you can perform a RETURN-FROM.
7:15:42Colleenphoe: Got it. I'll let Bike know as soon as possible.
7:16:15Colleenphoe: Bike said 6 hours, 16 minutes ago: why does pitman's handler-case impl (and by extension yours) get out of the handler functions with a tagbody, instead of just immediately doing the return-from?