11:26:41PPHello. How do I do `(dotimes (i 10) (dotimes (j 10) (print (cons i j))))` equivalent in loop? I mean `(loop for i upto 10 for j upto 10` goes in parallel so to speak and doesn't give permutations
16:17:53Inlineunderstanding the machinery is a thing but modeling your domain is another thing....
16:18:50Inlinethere are so many variation possibilities....it's kinda parametric
16:19:03Inlinehard to get my head around, how to start etc....
16:19:45pnpgoodbye OOP... someone thinks it's old style
16:20:13Josh_2Theres a digital copy that I have but It's not very good quality, looks like someone did a bad job scanning the book into a digital format
17:36:39mrcode_is there a way to declare a type so that it maps to uint32_t to take advantage of a natural wrap-around once it goes beyond uint32_max ?
17:37:38Biketype declarations don't influence semantics like that.
17:38:10Bikehowever, if you wrap your arithmetic in logand the complier might take care of it (sbcl does, at least)
22:28:37|3b|it could break macros (or special forms implemented as macros) or compiler macros that expect the official definitions, so not really a good idea anywayy