20:08:11Godel[m]Hi, in https://fare.livejournal.com/188429.html, the author claims that `… Racket keeps evolving, and not just "above" the base language, but importantly below. This alone makes it vastly superior to CL …`. What could it mean to evolve below the language? Is he referring to the subsets of racket that exist (functional, lazy)? (I haven't programmed in racket.)
20:13:11Bikegiven the example of ffi, i would guess runtime type stuff
20:14:38mfianoAlso, he eventually moved to Gerbil Scheme, though I believe he is doing mostly ML these days.
20:15:16oni-on-ionGodel[m], perhaps something about racket swapping their guts to chez scheme recently
20:15:43Godel[m]Sorry, I don't understand what is runtime type stuff. I haven't dealt with racket at all.