6:54:04jackdanielthanks for chipping in with your understanding/interpretations
8:12:33schweersI have a question, which may be sbcl specific, or may have no meaningful answer. I have fasl files on disk. Is there a way to inspect which optimization qualities were used to build them?
8:44:42schweersdim: I normally don’t need this information, it is just for debugging purposes after the fact. I want to know if I accidentally used the wrong settings.
8:52:01splittistHaving read (well, skimmed) the 'proceedings', I wonder if ELS could take a stand for abandoning double-column article format (especially with CL's appropriately-descriptive-identifier-style.
8:52:45beachsplittist: That would make it more difficult to be associated with the ACM, I would think.
8:54:28splittistWhat a twisted web. And to think some academics give advice on how society should be ordered... (:
9:01:31splittistThey could pretend they were writing for the Journal of Computing and Cultural Heritage (not too far from the truth); the ACM allows a single column format for that...
9:06:25pjbschweers: note that this requires that you reset *gensym-counter* when you compiled the file! ccl seem to have reproducible builds, but I don't know if that's the case with sbcl (often compiler added a time-stamp…)
9:08:31schweersuhhh ... did you just write that for me? Or did you have this lying around anyway?
9:17:28makomoanother interview with a famous lisp name
9:22:28schweerspjb: I’ve successfuly loaded your code into a fresh image. I’m not sure about your example usage. why do you do this? (load (compile-file "~/o"))