freenode/#lisp - IRC Chatlog
Search
18:51:01
jackdaniel
it is a logical pathname to something like /usr/lib/clasp-x.x.x/modules/asdf2.fasl
18:51:56
jackdaniel
and warning is being generated from ASDF itself, it doesn't like its previous incarnations. it is not about asdf2 being loaded, but mere about being present in the path
21:23:12
drmeister
I'm dropping source code and a cache directory full of compiled files into a docker image and then running code.
21:23:38
drmeister
asdf is rebuilding everything even though the timestamps are preserved - so I'm a bit puzzled.
21:47:16
drmeister
Is there a function like (asdf:why-the f*ck-are-you-rebuilding-everything system)?
21:49:09
Shinmera
You can manually build an ASDF action plan (I showed you how once before) -- the plan should only include things that need to be done, excluding already performed operations
21:49:24
Shinmera
Then you can try tracing select functions in ASDF to see where it's getting things from
22:04:53
AeroNotix
is there an asdf function that can find the modules that the `:components` key describes. Alternatively, a function that gives me the asdf definition?
22:07:23
Shinmera
If you want the list of components in the system definition, asdf:component-children
23:04:59
aeth
dim: Idk, I think the most graceful way for an IRC client to fail is to pretend like it's working, complete with fake conversations. The conversations are even predictable: talk about how the IRC client is now working.
0:03:33
dwrngr`
I think of it like the street slang of programming. It has a consistency to it and you have to keep up somewhat in order to fit in. But it gets in the way in a professional setting :P
0:06:19
dwrngr`
I guess Typescript is supposed to make it more tolerable there, but personally the limited times I have to use it I've found parenscript to make life a lot simpler
0:44:37
aeth
(And if you wanted to do a TypeScript-like-thing in CL all you'd need is a handful of macros)
2:27:54
kenster
doing some live lisp programming here: https://youtu.be/l4Uj13QLtpU or https://www.twitch.tv/kingherring
3:07:11
siraben
You might see "Quit" in the minibuffer time to time when he presses C-g to cancel selection
3:12:57
mason
If you *really* want to achieve flow, though: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sBvt0lsoInc
6:37:12
v0|d
beach: is there a way to make a very tiny lisp image that removes all the unused functions removed?
6:38:20
v0|d
I mean, GHC can actually compile programs to a small binary w/o repls or anything but a main().
6:40:19
Shinmera
it's called tree-shaking. Most implementations don't offer it because people have plenty of RAM and disk space now.
6:41:36
aeth
I think one problem is that large Lisp programs will probably use most of the language, especially if they're using dependencies that can be very stylistically different from each other.
6:42:06
edgar-rft
it sounds easier than it is because you need to remove all unused implementation-internals, too
6:42:22
aeth
Right, the implementation internals might also use stuff like e.g. structure-objects even if you don't use any