Search
Saturday, 21st of October 2017, 0:09:05 UTC
0:10:49
bigos
looks like my simple experiments with CFFI have worked
0:10:49
minion
bigos, memo from phoe_: nie dam rady, padam ;_;
5:09:02
beach
Good morning everyone!
5:50:53
beach
gilberth: Hello! What's up?
9:50:36
shrdlu68
ACTION tricks his brother into learning lisp.
10:10:53
jackdaniel
my little brother, this is python -very popular language. Parens? yes, that's embodiment of Python as a snake. No, it is natural that binary is named sbcl – python is its internal compiler :-)
11:59:42
dmiles
is CLtL2 backwards compatible with CLtL1 ?
12:02:38
Shinmera
dmiles: Why do you need to know?
12:03:18
dmiles
i am implementing a "new" common lisp :)
12:03:54
Shinmera
I wouldn't assume any general "compatibility" between the different CL editions, though.
12:03:59
dmiles
and wanting to stage how much i get done (in what order)
12:04:25
Shinmera
Ansi is the standard, so I don't see why you would want to look at the drafts leading up to it at all.
12:05:39
dmiles
well its good i can start by passing https://www.cs.cmu.edu/Groups/AI/lang/lisp/doc/standard/tests/0.html (CLtL1)
12:05:57
dmiles
its more what order of passing tests
12:06:24
oleo
start with ansi then if you want to further it
12:06:26
Bike
that doesn't make sense to me. it's likely that tests for cltl1 are not valid for a cltl2 or CL implementation.
12:07:05
dmiles
that should been my real questiion about tests for cltl1 are valid or not
12:07:25
Shinmera
You should not assume any general compatibility.
12:07:32
Shinmera
Doing such an evaluation would be a lot of involved work.
12:07:42
Shinmera
Besides, there's https://github.com/robert-strandh/ansi-cl-tests
12:08:48
dmiles
well yeah i could just work on the ansi tests .. that works out
12:09:00
Shinmera
It's not like CLtL1 would be much less work to implement than ansi either.
12:09:05
jackdaniel
here is canonical repository: https://gitlab.common-lisp.net/ansi-test/ansi-test
Saturday, 21st of October 2017, 12:09:05 UTC