8:16:44jackdanielare there volunteers to poke holes in this region-contains-region-p method implementation? http://hellsgate.pl/files/7888842a-polyline-v-line.lisp
8:18:54jackdanielhttp://hellsgate.pl/files/43ba2ec6-polyline-v-line.lisp (this version has coordinate-* function at the top)
8:22:42jackdanielhttp://hellsgate.pl/files/3b30d6e8-polyline-v-line.lisp and this version has polyline-vs-polyline (basically the same with a twist)
8:28:09jackdanielnvm, I've found some problems myself :)
10:10:37frgojackdaniel: I did a rebase and updated the PR for CLX.
10:30:10jackdanielfrgo: maybe you forgot to push? I still see conflicts (and merge button is disabled)
10:30:20jackdanielor maybe rebase failed, or you forgot to pull before rebase?
10:32:16scymtymcan you remove the "CHANGED" prefix from the commit messages and squash the little adjustments while you are at it?
10:38:24jackdanielI'm thinking about implementing region predicate and composite protocol for region sets separately (after said protocols are implemented for "single" regions). implementation is complex enough that I feel a need to use full region protocols to work with them
10:39:19jackdanielotherwise than that I'm planning to set some constraints about who may call what