9:04:02jackdanielwhat's the point of naming things then? all inspectors could be labeled "inspector"
9:11:31lokeIf the “new cluseau” is similar enough to the first one, then having the same name makes sense. If they are wildly different, then I don't think having the same name is a good idea.
10:28:38scymtymthe new inspector performs more or less the same task, using it feels similar, but the architecture is very different and the code is a complete rewrite
10:29:31scymtymso users might accept it a continuation and improvement of clouseau while somebody using clouseau programatically will not feel at home at first
11:12:52beachI doubt that there are many users of old Clouseau, and even fewer that use it programmatically. My estimate is 0.
13:05:46scymtymyes, the discussion is likely academic
13:12:57beachIt is. And I think the name Clouseau is just great.
13:13:27beachmoore33 was the one who came up with it, by the way.
20:00:25Xoflet's not use "academic" as a word that means "meaningless". The wound is still raw!
20:08:47scymtymXof: sorry. i was dissatisfied with that while writing the message but i couldn't think of a better word (as a non-native speaker, i would like to add in my defense)