3:56:34beachscymtym: I think you should consider it an improvement to Clouseau and thus replace the existing code for it. The name is too good to waste.
8:28:44jackdanielwouldn't taht be confusing for users?
8:29:02jackdanieli.e someone is used to clouseau and bam, clouseau is something quite different
9:04:02jackdanielwhat's the point of naming things then? all inspectors could be labeled "inspector"
9:11:31lokeIf the “new cluseau” is similar enough to the first one, then having the same name makes sense. If they are wildly different, then I don't think having the same name is a good idea.
10:28:38scymtymthe new inspector performs more or less the same task, using it feels similar, but the architecture is very different and the code is a complete rewrite
10:29:31scymtymso users might accept it a continuation and improvement of clouseau while somebody using clouseau programatically will not feel at home at first