2:01:52Bikedeleting the build directory was enough
2:03:08karloszi guess a negative vla would be really bad, and that does tmatch the error given
2:03:29karloszi don't know enoguh about C++, but i think in C its okay to go back and forth between unisgned and signed integers
2:03:33Bikeyeah, trying to allocate nine quintillion bytes or whatever might cause a sigbus
2:04:15Bikeevery so often i learn the C conversion rules, and then i forget them because they're weird and boring
2:04:27Bikeand C++ has shit like "glvalues" so that's just a no-go
2:06:48Bikelet's see. "if the target type can represent the value, the value is unchanged. [...] otherwise, if the target type is signed, the behavior is implementation-defined"
2:07:20Bikemaybe someday we can run some strict llvm pass that'll print out six thousand warnings
2:30:33drmeisterDid you get it to work? Another issue with negative bignums?
3:28:03drmeisterkarlosz: Was the bignum literal compilation apparent in the flamegraph?
3:49:57karloszdrmeister: yes, it was prominent while compiling cryptographic lbiraries like ironclad and compression/uncompression libraries with lots of type declarations