Search
4:20:53
Bike
there's that decay thing again.
6:27:15
drmeister
::notify Bike What decay thing?
6:27:15
Colleen
drmeister: Got it. I'll let Bike know as soon as possible.
13:32:19
Colleen
Bike: drmeister said 7 hours, 5 minutes ago: What decay thing?
13:33:53
Bike
hmm. not actually _that_ many C++ functions with va-rest
13:35:52
Bike
but the ones that do exist are mostly not trivial to convert to using lists
13:41:37
Bike
i guess i can try implementing closureless calls for everything but va-rest calls
14:07:51
Bike
karlosz: do we delete unused closures now?
14:08:06
Bike
wondering if i can take all the weird guts out of clal-next-method yet
14:09:17
Bike
ah, yeah, and there it is right at the top of find-function-local-calls. neat.
14:15:56
Bike
hm but there are no lexical compiler macros so i can't really do it.. eck
14:17:11
Bike
that's a shame. i could lose all the walker crap.
14:34:59
Bike
&key in general will be a real annoyance for local calls
15:08:18
Bike
ok, i have local calls with &rest working now... no provision for dx-allocating the rest list, though
15:08:28
Bike
i mean, working without consing a closure
15:09:19
Bike
oh, wait, and i should prevent it from trying with va-rest
15:18:43
Bike
the alternate route to cleaning up c-n-m would be optimizing local functions that take &rest but then just apply it