13:33:24drmeisterAlso (and this is a big one) - lets say we decide to implement a 32 bit version of clasp? We have a whole mess of problems like the following.
13:34:09drmeisterIn that case int32/byte32 need to be handled like int64/byte64 now because Fixnums would be less than 32 bits.
13:34:54drmeisterFor now I've sworn off a 32bit version of Clasp because of problems like this.
13:35:32drmeisterSince I didn't handle this conversion problem properly I don't expect you to handle them.
13:36:09drmeisterSo feel free to add another "future 32bit conversion of Clasp" problem to the pile that I already started. :-)
13:38:09kpoeckI honestly think a 32bit clasp is not worth the investment of your time
13:39:01drmeisterI don't think so either. Clasp is for scientific computing and 64bit is the present and the future.
13:39:41drmeisterI just always thought it would be easier to implement a 32bit processor in a nanobot than a 64bit processor. (sigh)