Search
3:18:23
drmeister
Do you have any ideas of how to change literals to reduce the code size for inline.lsp?
3:18:34
drmeister
Because it's more than 10% of the code.
3:19:21
Bike
i'm wondering if we shouldn't just have some kind of binary serialization format
3:27:41
drmeister
It's not too much to ask. We are essentially spitting out instructions for a little virtual machine.
3:32:54
Bike
yeah. it's just turned out rather pathological...
3:33:07
Bike
it would be even better if we could let the linker handle things, but o well
3:37:37
drmeister
We should think this through with the new things we've learned over the last weeks.
3:50:39
drmeister
in cclasp backtraces are screwing up .
3:50:58
drmeister
It's a bit fussy because I don't know the size of functions loaded from fasl files.
6:53:02
beach
Good morning everyone!
13:13:55
drmeister
There’s a problem with backtraces in cclasp - I’m on it
13:14:28
drmeister
Not knowing the size of functions from fasl files is a pita.
13:23:05
drmeister
Maybe I'm not spilling register arguments into a discriminating function.